Showing posts with label film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film. Show all posts

Tuesday, 25 December 2012

Loving Vincent's diary - 2nd week (2/2)


BreakThru's producer Hugh Welchman (Oscar Winner for producing BreakThru's Peter and the Wolf) and painter/director Dorota Kobiela (director of BreakThru's Little Postman and Chopin's Drawings) are co-writing BreakThru's latest film, Loving Vincent, the world's first feature length painting animation film. The film is a mystery thriller looking into the life and death of Vincent Van Gogh, and is told through bringing over 120 of Vincent's masterpieces to animated life...

The script is on its fourth, and final, draft, and wth production scheduled for spring 2013, the pressure is mounting. This weekly diary will candidly record their process of writing the elusive final draft.

Loving Vincent's diary - 2nd week (2/2)

Thankfully I have rarely suffered from hangovers, so I woke up at 9am, leaving Dorota to sleep it off a bit more and went and bought myself some clothes, seeing as we didn't have our washing machine plumbed in yet back in Warsaw, and I hadn't got around to going to launderette, I had to buy my clothes for the trip ahead. And of course my winter clothes were in the wrong city anyway, so I bought the cheapest hat and gloves that H&M had to offer.  

When we finally assemble all our stuff from the various studios, friends and relatives I'll probably realise we need to re-renovate our place with more storage. My itinerant life has been for three years, prior to that I moved only twice in a decade; Vincent was itinerant his whole adult life. But when he left a place it was often very abruptly, leaving his stuff behind, with a retinue of angry creditors making a return unlikely. For sure there were scores of early Van Gogh drawings and paintings that were left behind, and probably broken up and sold for wood by the creditors he fled from… amazing to think if they had just left it in their attics their children would have become multi-millionaires! This is to add to the Van Goghs destroyed in wars; stolen; and the one- a portrait of Madame Ginoux that Vincent set out from the St Remy Asylum on day release to give to her, but when he was found in the streets of Arles, dazed and confused, he was without the painting. Just imagine unearthing one of these after 125 years!! The nearest I have heard to something like this is the Finnish Department of Foreign Affairs. One of their junior employees in the French embassy was tasked with going out and buying some art, he came back with two Van Goghs, which appalled his conservative superiors, so he got demoted, or fired, or moved, and the two paintings sat in the attic of the Finnish embassy for 30 years, until someone realised they had two insanely valuable paintings rudely stacked among bric a brac. 

 Acceptably clad in clean warm clothes we struck out into the white grey gloom for Holland. Obviously Liege didn't want us to go, either that or I was over estimating my morning lucidity as we managed to re-enter the city twice before finally striking out on a long straight white road instead of the motorway (which was clogged with standstill traffic). The road was virtually empty, dissecting barren white fields. It was a relief to enter a forest, where all the branches bent ominously under piles of fresh wet snow. We passed Neunen, but decided that another standstill motorway was sufficient to deter us from seeing the place where Vincent spent more time than any other during his years as a painter, and the only place he didn't leave abruptly. This was where his ageing father had been sent, to preside over a small protestant community in an overwhelmingly Catholic village. His father and the parsonage were at the centre of the community, but this was disrupted by the arrival of the eldest son, who by now was an avowed atheist; who insisted in dressing in peasant clothes; and who would accost anyone he saw to come and model for him. At this time he worked furiously to master drawing, but also developed as a painter, painting what is heralded as his first masterpiece: The Potato Eaters. While he felt this was a breakthru, and he sent copies of it to many people who he wanted to impress, many of who had abandoned him, and in whose eyes he longed to be redeemed. But no one seemed to see what he saw, his friend van Rappard, put it:

 "Why do you see and treat everything so superficially? How far from true is that coquettish little hand of the woman in the background… And why isn't that man to the right allowed to have a knee, a belly and lungs? Or are they located in his back? And why must his arm be a yard too short? And why must he do without one half of his nose? And why must that woman on the left have some sort of little tobacco-pipe stem with little cube at the end for a nose?"

The friendship was crushed, as many of Vincent's friendships with other artists were, by bitter invective. van Rappard has a point, but as Vincent retorted, he also misses the point. And van Rappard's work is now a footnote in art history, mentioned only for his interaction with Vincent. Rappard was not the only one to scorn The Potato Eaters; his brother Theo rallied an array of criticism from himself, backed up by other artists and dealers in Paris. Wounded, but still belligerent Vincent conceded his figures were crude, but said that it had spirit and a life that would shine through:

 "I should be in despair if my figures were good rather…everything depends on how much life and passion an artist is able to express."

 On Sunday we would get to see this at the Van Gogh Museum but first we had to find out what was at the Hague. I was still getting stick for being stubborn and making us go to the Hague when there was only one van Gogh there. We arrived in the Hague to find the Maritshaus museum …. closed for renovation!!! What is going on - the van Gogh Museum, the Rijks Museum Maritshaus, all at the same time? What is so special about 2013 that they all need to be re-vamped for, or maybe the staff just want to party before the end of the world? Anyway precious museum time was being lost: did you know that museums in Holland close at 5pm (!?) as someone who has mainly visited art museums in London and New York this seemed seriously anti-social, and for the whole trip we felt like we were breaking land speed records to make it in time for closing. So onto Gementemuseum, with a time limit of 30 minutes. We went straight to see the three Rembrandts. One of his early works, that made him famous, 'Anatomy lesson of Dr Nicholaes Tulp', was flanked by two paintings from three decades later, towards the end of his career, 'Homer' and 'Two Negroes'. To be honest I wouldn't have given Anatomy Lesson a second glance if Dorota hadn't told me it was so famous, but even with my walking painting encyclopedia next to me, I had trouble studying it… when the other two are just so fascinating - the lighting in these and the way it is painted is impressionistic, counter to the realism of the earlier work, both early and late work have amazing lighting, but the later ones are dark, mysterious: something you can get lost in. There was no time to dwell on anything else; we scoured the rooms in search of the sole Hague van Gogh. Embarrassingly we both walked right past it, and had to have it pointed out to us: 'Garden At Arles', 1888.

 My heart sank; I had siphoned time away from museums with 100's of van Goghs for this.... It seemed a bit of a mess, not one of his great paintings, not one of the great Arles landscapes. I walked away from the picture, and turned to give it one last look… and from a distance it looked totally different. I was standing on the right of it facing it, at 10 metres away, and the painting… came alive. The path drew me in, the perspective was deep and intriguing, the staccato multicoloured brush strokes that seemed unnecessary up close cohered to give you the feeling of an over-flowing garden shimmering under intense summer sunshine. It brought a smile to my face. One thing I couldn't bear to, or afford to buy, was new winter boots, as I bought a very nice pair last year, so I had been walking around for the whole trip with my feet soaking in my summer trainers, and here- looking at this- I felt like I could walk down the path and be enveloped by cicadas and Mediterranean heat.

 As I am writing this, I am looking again at the painting on line: http://www.googleartproject.com/collection/gemeentemuseum/artwork/garden-at-arles-vincent-van-gogh/432790/ and it is just not the same painting. Here it is in high resolution courtesy of the Google Art project, but for this painting, well it seems almost pointless in reproduction. And that is the thought that I took away from the Hague. I have been looking at all his paintings in books, by necessity, and in books you miss the texture and you miss the depth/perspective in his work. This trip started with a reminder of the lengths that we went to achieve depth and perspective in our last films, winning the top prize for use of depth in film, and here I was struck by the unexpected and transformative depth in the first Van Gogh's painting that we had seen on this trip. I would be sure to be looking out for this on the rest of the trip. 
 A minute past our curfew, we raced back to our illegally parked car and drove furiously to Rotterdam under a glorious heavy orange sun, calling ahead to the museum to check they wouldn't close on us. When we arrived half an hour before closing they kindly decided not to charge us, and directed us to the van Gogh's. After my depth revelation we looked at the decidedly flat, portrait of Armand Roulin. And I was rather disappointed that it was the three quarter profile Armand, rather than the head on one of him in his yellow suit that we use in the Concept trailer. I am also influenced by the fact that I love our Amand Roulin character in the film; he will be the narrator for our film sequence that we are planning to use for Kickstarter- 'The Ear'. So I left Dorota to studying it carefully and moved on to the next ones. 

They had poplars near Nuenen, a painting I liked very much, mainly because I thought it was dramatically useful for the film. 

(source: wikipedia.org)
 It is from 1885, and I wondered from when in 1885, whether it was after his father's death in March of that year. Centre of the picture is the church spire in black silhouette, and under it in the foreground two women in black, and of to the side of them a man in peasant blue overalls, Vincent's default clothing at the time, who is holding some unidentifiable white stick in his hand. And it is an avenue of poplars, a tree that signifies loneliness, artisticness, and lacking in confidence... Could it be symoblising that he has lost his way in the wake of his father's death, and the black figure is mother and sister who turned their back on him, and all is dominated by the dead pastor, in the form of the silhouetted spire at the heart of the picture? Maybe the unidentified white is a blind man stick- symbolising Vincent's blindness. I have to check the date of the painting, and also whether I can find any references in his letters to the paintings, or to poplars, and check when the white cane first started to be used. Whether I am finding symbolism that isn't there, this painting has great dramatic potential for Vincent's departure from Nuenen in the film; and the fact is that most of Vincent's subjects were highly symbolic and much related back to his family, his mother's love of nature, and his father's religious teaching. 

1885 was a key year for Vincent. On the one hand he was super prolific, and had the breakthru of the Potato Eaters, on the other hand his relations with his family deteriorated disastrously, and the sudden death of his father made things worse, as his mother and sisters in part blamed him for the death of his father. Vincent had terrible and violent rows with his aged father, and to a lesser extent with his mother and sisters. He desperately wanted their love, as you can see from his letters when they are apart, but in these two years he railed against the views and authority of his ageing father- openly drinking, whoring, declaring his atheism, trying to tear down his father's world view- even as his father was bemusedly trying to understand and accept his son's chosen vocation, one that produced no money, just sucked it out of the family at an alarming rate. After his death he was hounded out of home by his sister and mother, and… would never return home or see them again. Once again he was leaving a place under a cloud, but not just any place, he was leaving the family that he so wanted to be loved by, for good. But... he was leaving as a painter; the die was cast. 

The one painting where there can be no doubt of its symbolic meaning, painted just after his father's death, is Still life with a Bible. This would be a treat for the following day. 

Having lost myself in thoughts on Poplars near Nuenen, we then used the final minutes to scout around the gallery. I was struck by the work of the Hague School, especially a large painting by Anton Mauve, the star of the Hague school, who was an uncle to Vincent by marriage, and who can be credited as the man who persuaded Vincent to paint. Until his apprenticeship to Mauve, Vincent was completely set on being an illustrator. Inevitably they had a seismic falling out, but Van Gogh always thereafter sought Mauve's approval, which was never forthcoming. When Mauve died Vincent sent him 'Peach tree in blossom' to his widow, and Mauve's granddaughter, three decades later, sold this for a hundred times more than the highest selling of her grandfather's paintings. I only knew Mauve through his role in Vincent's story, I had never seen his work, so I was surprised to be very struck by his paintings. While he might have been chained to the dealer system, his paintings were often pre-sold by Tersteeg (Vincent's nemesis), who harried him for as many paintings as possible, churning them out for the American market, he is someone with sensitivity and passion for his work. The Hague school duly visited, we had 30 seconds to admire Pieter Bruegel's the tower of Babel. Too short, a great affecting image whether on a postcard or on the Internet; it was a complete treat to see the actual painting, even for under a minute. Not for the first or last time on the trip we were escorted from the premises!!!

(source: wikipedia.org)

 by Hugh Welchman



Thursday, 19 April 2012

The Rebirth of Frankenweenie and Tim Burton's Stop-Motion Dreamscapes

With his full-fledged zombie dog remake on its way to cinemas, BreakThru Films examines Tim Burton's ongoing love affair with stop-motion animation.
The revivified Frankenweenie makes his
 way to the cinemas this October
It seems fitting for a director whose career is so shrouded in darkness and long creeping shadows that Tim Burton's first film is not merely lost in the mists of time, but may in fact exist only in myth. If Burton's own account in the 2006 book Burton on Burton, his film-making began with The Island of Dr. Agor, a stop-motion animation based on H.G. Wells similarly titled story of genetically modified body-horror The Island of Dr. Moreau, however many have speculated that the film is little more than an April Fools Day prank. Whether fragments eventually emerge or the myth is dispelled, one fact seems certain, that by the tender age of 11 Burton was already deeply interested in the art of animation, just as he had immersed himself in classic American B-movies, Japanese mega-monster extravaganzas as the peculiar camp of Roger Corman's Edgar Allen Poe films, with their lugubrious star Vincent Price. While he was dropping out of Burbank High School he was also expanding his knowledge of film-making, taking in the stop-motion masterpieces of Ray Harryhausen as well as traditional hand-drawn animation. On graduation, Burton proceeded to the California Institute of the Arts, where he was to make his first surviving animated short, the punningly titled Stalk of the Celery Monster.
Dark, disturbing and deliciously comic, Celery Monster
showcased Burton's emerging distinctive style
Though only images and fragments of the film remain extant, the influence of German expressionist cinema and Universal Pictures monster movies is clear in Burton's surreal aesthetic. Shadows leap in points, architecture and design has a touch of the European art nouveau and the characters are irrefutably ghoulish. Burton's film caused quite a stir, and soon caught the eye of Disney Animation Studios, who rapidly hired Burton as an apprentice animator. He cut his teeth at Disney creating story-boards and concept art for a number of their less successful early 80's animations, but it was with his first solo film, 1982's animated short Vincent that Burton was able to indulge his passion for gothic horror and his admiration for stop motion animation and its potential to realize the playful yet unsettling aesthetic of his pencil drawings. Though Celery Monster had been successful in capturing some of the scratchy, nightmarish intensity of Burton's drawing style, the slightly jerky, marionette-like quality of stop-motion, suggestive of the early days of silent cinema and the expressionist horrors of F.W. Murnau's Nosferatu or Robert Weine's Cabinet of Dr. Caligari gave Vincent an instantly recognizable yet utterly fresh aesthetic.

Vincent is haunted by animated visions from Burton's
twisted imagination
Adapted from one of Burton's own poems, Vincent was originally intended as a children's book, however the director was afforded a modest budget to create the short film, and in many ways the aesthetic which he established in it would come to define much of his work through the 1980's and beyond. Though Burton's next film, the original live-action Frankenweenie was judged a money-wasting flop by Disney executives and led to Burton's firing, he was soon to return to a wilder visual style with the major cinematic hits Pee-Wee's Big Adventure and Beetlejuice.

The original Frankenweenie has gained something of
a cult following despite a disastrous initial reception
Both of these mega-hits brought Burton back to the world of stop-motion animation, which they used to add an exaggerated Tex Avery-style strand of mayhem to the live action proceedings that surrounded them. In Beetlejuice, the central couple who find themselves suddenly thrust into the Other Side are trapped in their house by a monstrous plasticine sandworm, and at one point twist their faces into grotesque elastic monster-masks in order to perform their 'bio-exorcism'. The stop-motion effects in Beetlejuice contribute hugely to its success and its ability to maintain a light carnivalesque visual tone despite the themes of death, suicide and the bleak Kafka-esque bureaucracy of the afterlife.

The stop-motion sand worm strikes in Beetlejuice
The success of these two films, both critical and commercial, reinvigorated major studio interest in Burton, and he went on to direct two blockbuster Batman films and the surprise smash-hit Edward Scissorhands, an elegiac gothic romance which saw Burton's dark aesthetic clash brilliantly against the pastel and picket-fence world of American suburbia. It was in the writing and production of Disney's A Nightmare Before Christmas, however, that Burton would return to stop-motion animation in a film which was to become his trade-mark. Part Christmas-film, part Halloween-horror, part-musical and all rendered in exquisite stop-motion, Burton's film was practically a love-letter to the medium, and is often credited with sparking a major resurgence of interest in its potential for film-makers and advertisers. 

Henry Selick and Tim Burton with the set of
A Nightmare Before Christmas
The story of the King of Halloween's bungled attempts to try his hand at Santa's role, it involved the use of highly stylized puppets, performing against a backdrop composed of the twisted hills and spiked gratings of Burton's idiosyncratic drawing style. Burton chose this style of animation partially to reference the American favourite Rankin/Bass Productions, whose holiday specials included stop-motion renditions of classic stories such as The Little Drummer Boy. This gave the film a direct relevance to those audiences which had grown up watching these classic Christmas treats, and made Burton's subversion of Holiday iconography all the more delicious.

Still from Rankin/Bass's Little Drummer Boy, a far-cry from the
twisted world of Jack and Sally
A similar style of stop-motion animation was used in Burton's co-production James and the Giant Peach, where Burton's flair for the macabre was kept on a tighter leash, but which nevertheless displayed some masterful animation, particularly in the huge flock of seagulls straining to keep the peach afloat. James returned to the mixed-medium approach of Beetlejuice in its use of stop-motion to bring to life the more fantastical elements of the young boy's adventures once he has entered the peach, while his more prosaic life with Aunt Sponge and Aunt Spiker was presented with live action. It's a successful approach which acknowledges the slightly numinous quality of the form, its suggestion of a world of the imagination or the unconscious which exists at right-angles to prosaic reality.
There was a cameo for Jack Skellington in Burton's next
stop-motion animation,
James and the Giant Peach
Though budgetary concerns scuppered Burton's ambition to realize the alien invaders of Mars Attacks! with stop-motion, he was soon to return to the form in a major way with the creation of dark fairy-tale Corpse Bride. A conscious successor to Nightmare Before Christmas, Corpse Bride took the same aesthetic and animation style and set it to a more serious and in many ways more adult tale of love and loss. Corpse Bride was also the first Burton film to feature Tim Allen, who has worked with BreakThru  on both The Magic Piano and The Flying Machine, on its animation team; he has recently returned to work with Burton on Frankenweenie.

Burton chose a more muted and cold aesthetic for Corpse Bride, demonstrating
the flexibility of stop-motion and its ability to achieve a variety of tones
Corpse Bride was a big hit for Burton, and though his subsequent films displayed a stronger reliance on computer generated animation techniques, the upcoming Frankenweenie is a clear indication that he still holds stop-motion in the very highest regard. Just over a week ago another exciting announcement indicated that Burton's next major project will also be of interest to fans of traditional animation, as the director indicated that he was looking forward to moving into pre-production on a new ghoulish stop-motion feature titled Night of the Living. Cheerfuly tweaking the conceit of George A Romero's zombie classic, this new film boasts a script from Burton's Dark Shadows collaborator Seth Grahame-Smith and is expected to go before the cameras in 2013.

As well as proving one of Hollywood's most bankable directors, with a slew of box-office smashes and oodles of critical acclaim to his credit, Tim Burton is also worthy of respect for his constant and vocal championing of the magic of stop-motion and other hand-animation techniques. Time-consuming, labour-intensive and often expensive, these could easily have fallen from fashion and from the radars of major studios had they not boasted such a credible and imaginative advocate.

- Stewart Pringle



Saturday, 7 April 2012

Pirates!, Aardman and the power of mixed-media animation

The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists is well on its way to being a box-office smash, and shows the brilliant Aardman Animation at their very best, but it's also a significant technical triumph, and a great demonstration of the strength of blending classic stop-motion techniques with cutting edge computer technology.
The Pirate Captain prepares to board...
Filled with the dry wit, hilarious visual gags and good-hearted adventure that has made Aardman Britain's leading animation studio, The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists was released in the UK last week, and looks sure to be as much of a hit with audiences as with critics. Based on the first of a series of comic novels by Gideon Defoe (hence it's idiosyncratic title, which would sit much more comfortably on a bookshelf than a cinema hoarding, and which is being changed to the more manageable The Pirates! Band of Misfits for its US release) it also has the potential to become a sizeable franchise.

If it does, then its success will be well-deserved. The Pirates! is a gleeful piece of swashbuckling family entertainment, every frame stuffed with brilliant jokes that demand a second or third viewing and a fantastic cast including a star-turn by Hugh Grant as the hapless Pirate Captain and the incredible Imelda Staunton as a pirate-hating Queen Victoria. It also has a winning script which refuses to talk down to its audience, keeping the parents interested with cameo appearances by the Elephant Man and Jane Austen rather than cheap 'adult' humour.

Perhaps best of all, and easiest to pass over, is its gorgeous animation, which manages to stay true to the stop-motion which made Aardman's name in the 1980's and 90's while providing eye-bursting 3D and seamlessly introducing a variety of computer generated landscapes and effects. 

It's not Aardman's first foray into mixed-media animation: the apparently 'home-spun' Wallace & Gromit in the Cure of the Were-Rabbit involved the participation of leading post-production company MPC Films, who provided a plethora of computer generated bunnies to 'bulk out' those created by Nick Park and his team.
Can you separate the CG bunnies from their plasticine cousins?
I'm not sure we can...
In The Pirates! however, Aardman incorporated mixed-media techniques throughout the animation process. Computer generation was handled in-house, made possible by Aardman's earlier experiments with computer generated animation for their modestly successful all-CG collaboration with Dreamworks, Flushed Away. As so much of Pirate Captain's adventures take place on the water, a famously time-consuming substance to work with in traditional stop-motion, it naturally suggested the full-on incorporation of computer generated visuals. 

The ocean swells, the sweeping vistas of Victorian London and a host of other elements have been rendered digitally rather than in-camera, and it is a credit to the skill of Aardman's team that the effect is never jarring. Aardman have essentially updated an intrinsic principle of animation, in which the background is 'pre-rendered', whether this means painted onto a single surface or onto multiple panes of glass as in many of Disney's most lush environments, while the characters are animated by hand and overlaid. Here it was the motley band of pirates and their (not very sea-worthy) ship that were superimposed over the computer generated environment using green screen.
Animators work to blend the set and characters into the
computer generated ocean environment - here Charles Darwin
is readied to walk the plank into a digital ocean
It doesn't stop there, the animation has also been rendered in highly effective 3D, and contains numerous moments which imitate traditional cell-animation. These include the comic travelling sequences, in which the pirate ship careers around a map, leaving a confused trail of red dots as it ricochets off cherubs and is blown around by baroque zephyrs. The result is a technical palette which pays homage to great animations of the past, contains a visual style which is definitively 'Aardman-esque' (all ping-pong ball eyes and letterbox jaws) while also allowing for spectacular set-pieces. Most importantly of all, the various techniques compliment one another, rather than creating incongruities.

Mixed-media animation is something BreakThru Films feel very strongly about, so we'll be cheering The Pirates! on to success when it opens in the US later this month. Our current projects, and particularly the short animations created for Chopin's Études, have been created with a wide variety of technical processes, blended together to create visually distinctive films which are both aesthetically powerful and technically progressive. The Flying Machine sees live-action blending with computer generated graphics and 3D stop motion animation, continuing a lineage which extends back through Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Mary Poppins and beyond.
Our stop motion animated Flying Machine against
a computer generated vista
We're also very excited about Scarecrow, which has recently been selected for the BeFilm 2012 Underground film festival in New York at the end of this month. It's to be shown in 3D, as intended, and we hope it can demonstrate (as The Pirates! does) that 3D really can be the future of animation, if studios have the confidence to develop their films in true-3D, rather than simply slapping on the effect in post-production to increase box-office revenue. Used effectively, in collaboration with the other animation techniques, it can be spectacularly effective and moving.
Rotoscoping, a technique which has been used since
the birth of animation, gives
Scarecrow a real sense
of living history
Scarecrow uses a combination of traditional animation, rotoscoping and 3D computer generated graphics to tell the story of a fallen soldier in Poland's November Revolution. The rotoscope technique allowed the animators to bring the startling paintings of Polish painter Jerzy Duda-Gracz to life, creating an aesthetic that at once stays true to the era Chopin evokes, while at the same time involving the work of one of Poland's most significant modern artists. As the story progresses and the soldier's soul seems to rise up from his broken body, directors Przemyslaw Anusiewicz and Janusz Martyn begin to introduce 3D computer generated elements, strange cloaked figures which dance above the marshland like animated shrouds. Viewed in 3D, it is an effect which simply could not be achieved with traditional animation, a true example of technology making the impossible possible.
Computer generated animation brings a more haunting aspect of
Duda-Gracz's art to life in striking 3D
Whether allowing pirate ships to spring forty feet above a crystal-clear ocean, or bringing a haunting vitality to some of Poland's most beautiful art and music, mixed-media techniques are keeping animation at the cutting edge of film-making. The sense that an animated film can embrace a wide variety of technical forms is one which keeps it fresh and responsive to innovation and creative thinking.  The days in which stop-motion or traditional animation and computer generation were seen as mortal enemies, with the latter poised to consign its frame-by-frame predecesor to the dustbin of history, are thankfully far behind us. At BreakThru we're constantly looking forward to the next advancement, and as Aardman's Pirates! seem poised to storm the US box office, we're proud to be among such illustrious company.

-Stewart Pringle

Follow the BreakThru Films blog for future articles on some of the revolutionary techniques that we;re developing for upcoming projects. Except the ones that are too secret to show you yet...shhh!


Thursday, 5 April 2012

The Flying Machine - a multi-platform adventure

BreakThru Films founder and producer of The Flying Machine Hugh Welchman explains that the way we tell stories is changing all the time.
The Flying Machine will be taking off in more than cinemas
Our aim with The Flying Machine is to make a film that will push the boundaries of family animation, and for the range of products across different platforms that we are currently developing to be the first phase of the creation of an enduring franchise. We are in a period of massive change in the way that people are accessing and interacting with stories, music, art and games. Technology is not only changing the way we consume stories, it is changing the way stories are told.

BreakThru Films is all about delivering multiple entertainment and educational experiences across a range of platforms, traditional and new. The combination of cutting edge live action, amazing computer generated visual effects, state‐of‐the‐art 3‐D technology, Chopin’s timeless composing and Lang Lang’s kinetic piano playing, will create a truly moving and entertaining film for families of all ages.

The core iconic element across all delivery platforms is the flying machine itself. In the beginning nothing but a discarded piano, but when children discover it in moments of distress it transforms into something magical ‐ in the vein of Jules Verne and Hayao Miyazaki ‐ and transports them to a world without limits. It is the ultimate adventure den, and it will strike a chord with the imaginative child in each of us.

A metaphor for Chopin’s mesmerising and transporting music, the flying machine, like his music, will traverse Europe and the world. The audio, visual and cultural experience will have a transformative effect on people’s lives; flying into films, games and theatrical shows, onto the pages of books and the screens of mobiles, and into school curriculums. The Flying Machine is so distinctive it will win the hearts and spark the imagination of audiences all over the world.

We are breaking the mould with The Flying Machine. The sheer emotional impact and enjoyment of watching this unique film will make it a classic. Like Disney and Pixar’s most innovative films it is set to charm audiences through the generations.

- Hugh Welchman

Monday, 26 March 2012

The Birth of the Flying Machine

Company founder and producer of The Flying Machine, Hugh Welchman, lets us in on the genesis of his magical tribute to Chopin and the power of music.
Anna takes to the skies on The Flying Machine
On 15th March I flew to Wroclaw, at the invitation of Minister Zdrojewski, to take part in the 60th birthday celebrations of Polish Animation. It was 3 weeks after I had won the Oscar (for Peter and the Wolf) and offers had been flooding in to BreakThru suggesting what BreakThru should do next.

At the end of the evening the Minister said  he had an idea. He proposed that BreakThru would make another half hour animation for families in Poland, featuring the music of Chopin, and to be part of the 200th Anniversary celebrations of Chopin’s birth in 2010.

During the production of Peter and the Wolf I had decided that I liked working in Poland, and that it could offer a range of interesting possibilities for the future so I set up BreakThru Films Poland in July 2007, and my Polish team kick-started various small scale entrepreneurial ventures. Making an animated film featuring the music of Chopin seemed like an ideal choice to be BreakThru Films Poland’s first big project… I was very interested in his suggestion.

Like most English people my age my knowledge of classical music is very poor. In school music classes we would sing the Beatles, and my parents predilection for classical music made it seem stuffy in my eyes. But producing Peter and the Wolf, which came about because of the fact I was approached by a conductor who was interested in collaborations between film and live orchestra, had opened me up to classical music. I have probably listened to Peter and the Wolf more than anyone on the planet (apart from Peter and the Wolf’s writer and director, Suzie Templeton), and this got me into all of Prokofiev’s repertoire. I knew a lot about Prokofiev and his music, but that was pretty much it…

I knew Chopin by name, probably had heard his pieces at home as a kid (my step-father plays the piano well), but wouldn’t have been able to recognise a single piece of his music. I went out and bought his complete works, shut myself in a room and started listening to his music. I was guided in what I was listening to by my friend and long-time collaborator, Geoff Lindsey, who literally knows more about classical music than anyone on the planet. Certain things struck me immediately:
  1. Apart from a couple of piano concertos, Chopin basically wrote short pieces for solo piano, and this is what he was famous for.
  2. Chopin didn’t write music to stories; his music was very abstract.
With Peter and the Wolf we had a narrative piece of music; we had characters; we had a well known story. My first reaction was to try and make Chopin into Prokofiev: we would take Chopin’s great tunes and we would orchestrate them, so we could have a big orchestra, and we could create a film that we would accompany with live orchestra, like Peter and the Wolf. I was also mad into break-dancing at the time, I can’t remember why, and decided early on that I wanted the film to be a break-dance film. I just thought that combining Chopin’s tunes with break-dancing would be great.

I put together a working group of my trusted collaborators. Writer Marianela Maldonado and her husband and writing partner, Robin Todd, and writer Geoff Lindsey. They were to be the film’s writers. Marianela and Robin with their wild and wonderful imaginations, tempered by Geoff, the voice of classical music reason. And also in the working group my chosen director’s Martin Clapp and Adam Wrywas. Adam was our lead animator on Peter and the Wolf, a man with wild passion and magic hands. Martin Clapp was the reclusive head of layout and also an animator on Peter and the Wolf, who had impressed me recently with the waterfall of great ideas that streamed out of him in a recent brainstorming discussion with Director Frank Budgen about his film ShockHeaded Peter.

We were a pretty chaotic and motley collection, marshaled strictly by me. I had decided by the time of our first brain-storming sessions:

  1. We were going to use tristesse (Opus 10 no.3) as the theme tune for our film.
  2. It was going to be a musical and will feature breakdancing to Chopin. I had completely fallen for the artistic talents of choreographer and musical show director, Kate Prince, whose breakdance show, Into the Hoods, I had recently gone to see. And I brought her into our script sessions.
  3. I had been totally converted to Chopin by this stage, having listened to his music constantly for 2 months, and had come round to what Geoff had been telling me from the beginning- that if we were to do a film celebrating the music of Chopin- it would have to mainly feature his pieces for solo piano, and to make our lives easier, agreed with Geoff that we should restrict ourselves to the Études, as it fitted with the educational remit of what we were doing.
Martin wanted to make a film about magic or aliens. Marianela wanted to write Marianela-style grim fairy tales. Adam wanted to do the most beautiful animation in the world ever. Geoff wanted everyone to really appreciate the genius of Chopin. Kate I think was only ever marginally interested; I think our link to film interested her, and there was a certain curiosity as to the fact we wanted to do dance in animation.

At that stage I was working on a number of projects, most of which were feature films, and therefore commercially more viable than what was then labeled Project Chopin. We couldn’t do a feature film, because there was no way that we had either the time or the funding opportunities to do a stop-motion feature film.

But I had started something, and I was being pushed hard by my Polish trainee Producer, Magda Bargiel, who sensed that we had the opportunity to do a special project in Poland. Marianela and Robin were furiously outputting scripts to my brief that were getting lukewarm reactions from the directors and from Geoff. Marianela and Robin had been talking a lot with Martin, and they shared a lot in common in their tastes for the fantastical and magical in animation, and were bugging me to widen the brief. Begrudgingly I agreed, and I opened the lid on a whole range of robot, magic aliens, monsters and all sorts! Throughout this process Geoff was feeding us YouTube links and examples, and laying Chopin’s  études over all sorts of material- Polish skater videos, Woody Allen films, breakdancing. There was an emormous amount of research and ideas being generated through the scripting process.

One of the problems was that everything that Mari wrote Martin did these wonderful inspiring magical illustrations for, I wanted to make every one of the films that was in Martin’s drawings. But they were Trojan horses, smuggling other stories onto a vehicle that was for Chopin. I reigned the Trojan horse back in, but some of the magical ideas and fantasy from this explosion of different paths remained.

In this process of scripts and drawings Martin drew, inspired by the Lazienki Park Monument, a Flying Piano. Even the first thumbnails were beautiful, and it was the first piece that everyone got behind. It appealed to Adam’s sense of beauty, it appealed to Martin, Robin and Mari’s sense of fantasy, and Geoff and Marek thought it a beautiful metaphor for the transporting beauty of Chopin’s music. The Flying Machine became our anchor.

Mari and Martin immediately untethered it and we went flying off in all directions. I kept bringing it back to Poland; back to the fact I wanted a dance in there; back to the fact that the music wasn’t the soundtrack but needed to be the emotional core of the film.


- Hugh Welchman

For more information on The Flying Machine visit our page on Facebook